Legal Opinion

Sendak v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 29, 1986No. 3934PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

This appeal arises out of a stipulated judgment whereby the named defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Ridgefield (commission), and the defendant The Portland Corporation (Portland), agreed to settle several actions pertaining to Portland’s repeated attempts to obtain approval of its applications for subdivision of real property. The plaintiffs appealed to the Superior Court challenging the commission’s action in entering into the stipulated judgment. The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal. The principal issue before us is whether the commission’s decision to enter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Allied Plywood, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Mills v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. City of Hartford v. Hartford Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Connecticut Business & Industry Ass'n v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Willimantic Car Wash, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. City of Torrington v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Dietzel v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API