Legal Opinion
State v. Broadsword
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 23, 1983No. 10-82-01983, 10-82-02318, 10-82-02319, 10-82-02320, 10-82-02321, 10-82-02322, 10-82-02323, 10-82-02324, 10-82-02325, 10-82-02326, CA A26041, A26042, A26043, A26044, A26045, A26046, A26047, A26048, A26049, A26050PublishedCited by 2 opinions
(Cases Consolidated)
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals ten convictions of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements he made to the police and in sentencing him. We find no error and affirm.
Defendant was arrested on unrelated charges in Tillamook County on January 17,1982. Eugene police learned that a prescription bottle stolen in a Eugene burglary was found in his possession. On January 19, two Eugene detectives went to Tillamook to question defendant. They met him in the county jail, explained that they were investigating several Eugene…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. BarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984