Donaldson v. Temple
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Dillon, October term, 1912. Action by Kate E. Donaldson against L. W. Temple. Defendant appeals. cite: Damages must be proved with reasonable certainty: Page on Con., sec. 1675; 81 N. W. Ill; 37 S. E. 4; 25 S. C. 68; 81 S. C. 181; 40 S. C. 524; 70 S. C. 16; 60 S. C. 269. All the facts constituting the alleged fraud must be set out: 65 S. C. 184; 58 S. C. 56; Cooley on Tort. 474. cites: No fraudulent breach being alleged, punitive damages…
Read the full summary
Before C. J. Ramage, special Judge, Dillon, October term, 1912. Action by Kate E. Donaldson against L. W. Temple. Defendant appeals. cite: Damages must be proved with reasonable certainty: Page on Con., sec. 1675; 81 N. W. Ill; 37 S. E. 4; 25 S. C. 68; 81 S. C. 181; 40 S. C. 524; 70 S. C. 16; 60 S. C. 269. All the facts constituting the alleged fraud must be set out: 65 S. C. 184; 58 S. C. 56; Cooley on Tort. 474. cites: No fraudulent breach being alleged, punitive damages cannot be recovered: 77 S. C. 192; 70 S. C. 115; 91 S. C. 420. cite: Alleging facts which were wrong fid or necessarily…
1Opinion of the Court
December 15, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This was an action by plaintiff against the defendant for $9,000 damages on account of an alleged breach of contract by the defendant. The cause was heard in October, 1912, before special Judge Ramage and a jury. The question of damages was submitted to a jury and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,000, after entry of verdict and decree of Court, ordering sale of premises and referring the case to the master for Dillon county for the purpose of an accounting between the plaintiff and defendant, an appeal was taken by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welborn v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Van Weel v. WinstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Givens v. North Augusta Electric & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Gem Chemical Co. v. Youngblood & CothranSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- Prince v. State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Timmons v. Williams Wood Products Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Winthrop v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Skalowski v. Joe Fisher, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.