Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tedford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 2001No. 43 W.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Appellant Donald Tedford appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County denying his Petition for Relief Under the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541 et seq. (“PCRA Petition”) for being untimely. We agree with Appellant that the trial court erroneously determined that his PCRA Petition was untimely and therefore, remand this matter to the PCRA court to review the merits of the claims raised in Appellant’s PCRA Petition.

On February 6,1987, a jury convicted Appellant of the first-degree murder and rape of Jeanine Revak. Following a penalty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PriovolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. DuffeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RykardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. HenkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. TedfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. MarkowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API