Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1965No. 19,935Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Bierly, C. J.

— We feel impelled to discuss two questions of paramount importance in denying appellant’s Petition for Rehearing in the above entitled cause. First, we shall consider her belated verified motion for a change of venue from the Judge; the second relates to the allegation of kinship of the Judge to the defendant-appellee.

The majority opinion, as well as appellant’s Petition for Rehearing, sets forth verbatim point 8 of the Rule 1-12B of the Rules of the Supreme Court, which specifically sets up in detail the requirement and conditions to be met in filing of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Hasler v. HaslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API