Legal Opinion

Wolff v. Capital Transit Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1943No. 80Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Appellant sued the Capital Transit Company for damages to his automobile. The case was tried by the court, which, after finding that plaintiff’s negligence was the proximate cause of the collision, ordered judgment for defendant.

Certain facts are not in dispute. The collision occurred on Michigan Avenue, N. E., in the early afternoon. Defendant’s car tracks occupy the center of the street. The space between the car tracks and each curb is 20 feet wide. Plaintiff had passed the street car and his automobile was proceeding in a westerly direction, with the street car…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Ry. & Electric Co. v. StuartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1920
  2. Fulton's Ex'rs v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  3. MacDonald ex rel. Emmco Ins. Co. v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API