Legal Opinion

MacDonald ex rel. Emmco Ins. Co. v. Capital Transit Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1943No. 66PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Suit was brought by the owner of an automobile for damages caused to it by the alleged negligent operation of a street car of the- defendant Transit Company. The case was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was for defendant upon a finding that the car colliding with plaintiff’s automobile was not negligently operated by defendant’s motorman. Plaintiff has appealed. As the question on this appeal is whether the trial court’s finding “is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it” 1 a statement of the pertinent facts will be necessary.

On the morning of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Kelly Furniture Co. v. Washington Ry. & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  3. Capital Traction Co. v. AppleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1910
  4. Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. CullemberCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1912
  5. Capital Traction Co. v. DivverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolff v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API