Legal Opinion
C B S Steel & Forge Co. v. Shultz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1951No. 12864PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
Howard Lane and Harold W. Gentis brought an action against appellant. Appellant, as a third-party plaintiff, served a third-party complaint on Gordon W. Shultz, Ernest Puetz and Lee McCoy, as third-party defendants. See Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. Shultz, Puetz and McCoy moved to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. From an order (improperly called a judgment) granting the motion and dismissing the third-party complaint, appellant has ap>pealed. That order was not a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baltimore & OR Co. v. United Fuel Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- County Bank, Greenwood, S.C. v. First National Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- CPR Management SA v. Devon Park Bioventures LPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Ford Motor Co. v. Milby Ford Motor Co. v. MahoneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Hotel Roosevelt Co. v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Sechrist v. DykeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Barnett W. Woodby v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation, and Third-Party v. Edward Laverne Burghardt, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.