Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

States v. Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1984No. 2650Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, Judge

I join that portion of the majority opinion reversing the award of survivor’s benefits. However, as I believe the Supreme Court’s decision in Kamperis v. Nationwide Insurance Company, 503 Pa. 536, 459 A.2d 426 (1983) may result in some confusion, I must respectfully dissent to that portion of the majority opinion which affirms the award of work loss benefits.

The majority in Kamperis held that § 1009.106(c)(1) of the No-fault Act (the Act) controls an action brought to recover post-mortem work loss benefits where no-fault benefits have not been paid for loss arising otherwise than from death,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Antanovich v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Kamperis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Sachritz v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Marryshow v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Minier v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API