Legal Opinion

Bliss v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 2000PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying defendants’ motion for summary *913judgment and remitting to the Court of Claims for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum, and as so modified, affirmed.

Claimant George Bliss brought this personal injury action, arising out of an October 20, 1995 accident caused by a New York State Thruway Authority (NYSTA) truck driven by John Lawler. The Court of Claims granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, holding that a recklessness standard applied because the truck was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Riley v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Ring v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Primeau v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Farese v. Town of CarmelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Catanzaro v. Town of LewistonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API