Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided April 11, 2014No. Civil Action No. 4:13CV163PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

RAYMOND A. JACKSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Samuel White P.C.’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 16. Plaintiff Bonnie Mayo raises five state law claims against Defendants pertaining to the refinancing of her since-foreclosed home. For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Bonnie Mayo alleges the following relevant facts…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Filak v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  5. Donohoe Construction Co. v. Mount Vernon AssociatesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrett, Trustee v. Nancy Ann Rogers, Substitute TrusteeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API