Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 20, 1941No. 30198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Aubrey Mitchell petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by virtue of an order of the county court of Seminole county wherein it was adjudged that he was guilty of indirect contempt of court by reason of his neglect, failure, and refusal to comply with an order of that court in a bastardy proceeding to pay money to the complaining witness and to execute a bond to secure the same.

It is stipulated that an application for citation was filed, a citation issued and served upon petitioner, and that petitioner appeared in person and by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PlaistridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Ex Parte BighorseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. McKee v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Emery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Ex Parte LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. State v. McCainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API