Legal Opinion
Ralph Stroup v. Jo Ane B. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 16, 2003No. 02-12623PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge:
Former police officer Ralph Stroup appeals a district court decision upholding the Social Security Administration’s calculation of his disability benefits under the windfall elimination provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 415(a)(7). Finding the Commissioner’s construction of the windfall elimination provision reasonable, we affirm the decision of the district court.
I
Ralph Stroup began working for the Ko-komo, Indiana, Police Department (KPD) in January 1966. Under Indiana law and the KPD pension plan, he later qualified for retirement with pension benefits…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Donald Larry Martin v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Ricardo M. Siverio v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Hobbs Ex Rel. Hobbs v. ZendermanDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- Bitsacos v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Lorraine Beeler v. Andrew M. SaulCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.