Dodd v. BD. OF COM'RS OF ALA. STATE BAR
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Four charges were filed against James H. Dodd for solicitation in violation of Disciplinary Rule 2-103 (A)(1), Code of Professional Responsibility. Two of these charges were subsequently nol prossed. The Board of Bar Commissioners found Dodd not guilty on one of the remaining charges and guilty on the other charge. He was suspended from the practice of law for two years. He appealed.
This proceeding before the Board of Bar Commissioners occurred prior to the effective date of the new Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, published in Alabama Reporter, 353-355 So.2d XXXVII (1977-78). The Board of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carnegie v. CarnegieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Loveman v. LaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Acton v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Ex Parte ActonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Adams v. LoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hunt v. DISCIPLINARY BD. OF ALA. STATE BARSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Goldthwaite v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Goldthwaite v. DISCIPLINARY BD., ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982