Legal Opinion
Singh v. Bondi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 2025No. 24-815Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BALJIT SINGH, No. 24-815 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-180-861 v. OPINION PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted October 20, 2025 * Pasadena, California Filed December 1, 2025 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta, Ryan D. Nelson, and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge R. Nelson; Concurrence by Judge VanDyke * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 SINGH V.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Selamawit Zehatye v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.