Legal Opinion

Knight v. Estes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1963No. 39868PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

383 P.2d 879 (1963)

Mary Ellen KNIGHT, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

C.N. ESTES, individually, and d/b/a C.N. Estes Products, Defendant in Error.

No. 39868.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 16, 1963.

Wallace & Bickford, Ardmore, for plaintiff in error.

Fischl, Culp & McMillin, Ardmore, for defendant in error.

BERRY, Justice.

The parties here will be referred to as they appeared below. Plaintiff brought this action against defendant in the lower court for damages for personal injuries sustained by her as the result of a collision by the automobile in which she was a passenger, with the defendant's tar pot and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. C. P. Carter Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Miller v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Bottoms v. BottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. City of Tulsa v. PearsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Wasson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Graham v. KeuchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Bays Exploration, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Buckner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API