Magin v. Karle
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FBOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
These two causes present the same questions on the same state of facts. They were heard in the lower court and in this court as practically one case, and will therefore be considered and determined together. The suits were brought by the appellant as assignee of letters patent No. 248,646, granted to Charles Gordon, October 25,1881, for “an improved apparatus for cooling and drawing beer,” against the respective appellees for the alleged infriugement of the patent. The defences interposed by the answer of each respondent were, want of patentable novelty in the invention covered by the letters…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Le Roy v. TathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Fuller v. YentzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Carver v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grayson Heat Control v. Los Angeles Gas Appliance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Handel Co. v. Jefferson Glass Co.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1920
- Parlin & Orendorff Co. v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
- Universal Winding Co. v. Foster Mach. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1936
- Firment v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908