Legal Opinion

Howell v. Courtesy Chevrolet, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1971No. Civ. 36874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRAMPTON, J. *

Statement of the Case

Plaintiff sued for rescission of the purchase from defendant of three trucks, each equipped with rubbish bodies, for a total purchase price of $47,738.43, on the grounds of fraud, negligence, mistake and failure of consideration.

Plaintiff contends that it relied upon an invoice prepared by defendant Courtesy Chevrolet, Inc. (hereafter Courtesy), which included the description and cost of the three trucks with the rubbish bodies mounted thereon. Courtesy contends that this invoice was prepared for the convenience of plaintiff’s agent, Western Leasing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. House v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Bemer Aviation, Inc. v. Hughes Helicopter, IncDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Lucas v. George T. R. Murai Farms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API