Legal Opinion

Labasse v. Piat

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 8, 1908No. 16,953PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard; Nemours Henry Núñez, Judge. Action by Siles Labasse against Pierre Fiat. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

This suit was instituted to ¡abate defendant’s tallow plant as a nuisance and to recover damages in the sum of 83,000. A preliminary injunction was sued out, but was dissolved on bond.

The defendant for answer pleaded the .general issue, and averred that he was carrying on a lawful business under a permit from the police jury issued in October, 1895. On the day of the trial defendant filed a •supplemental answer, and annexed thereto a copy of an ordinance of the police jury relative to tallow, fertilizer, and rendering plants, adopted and promulgated in May, 1907, about four months after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. EylarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Oklahoma City v. TyteniczSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Meyer v. Succession of McClellanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Galouye v. A. R. BlossmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Weinberg v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API