Legal Opinion

Wells v. Branscome

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1954No. 39261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This suit is based upon the actionable words statute, Mississippi Code 1942, Section 1059, which provides: “All words which, from their usual construction and common acceptation, are considered as insults, and calculated to lead to a breach of the peace, shall be actionable; and a plea, exception or demurrer shall not be sustained to preclude a jury from passing thereon, who are the sole judges of the damages sustained; but this shall not deprive the courts of the power to grant new trials, as in other cases.

C. H. Wells, appellant, brought the action in the Circuit Court of Grenada County…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  3. Interstate Co. v. GarnettMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Blackburn v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newson v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Thomas v. Harrah's Vicksburg Corp.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
  3. Bumgart v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Isaacks v. ReedMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API