Legal Opinion

Bell v. Cafferty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Replevin by Cafferty against Bell for a mare. The cause was submitted to the Court on an agreed statement of facts, upon which statement the Court found for the plaintiff, and rendered judgment accordingly.

The defendant, having taken the proper steps to present the question involved, appeals. The following are the facts as agreed upon:

“Before and on the 17th day of August, 1868, the plaintiff was the owner of, and in possession of the mare in controversy; that on said day one-Stewart, who professed to be an agent for an Illinois insurance company, came to the plaintiff and proposed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HarbeckThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
  2. Trueblood v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Malcom & Gaul v. LoveridgeNew York Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berry v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. McClure v. . Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Meyer v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Curme, Dunn & Co. v. RauhIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Binford v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API