Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Hines

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1896No. 17,750PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— Appellee brought this action to enjoin appellant from engaging and* continuing in the undertaking business in the city of Portland, Indiana. The complaint was in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer for want of facts was overruled. An answer of general denial was filed, the cause tried by the court, and at request of appellant, a special finding of the facts made and conclusions of law stated thereon; to each of which conclusions of law appellant at the time excepted.

The court, over a motion for a venire de novo and a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment in favor of appellee,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cook v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  2. Welz v. RhodiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Beard v. DennisIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Beatty v. CobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Eisel v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ferris v. American Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Grand Union Tea Company v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Harris v. TheusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Bird v. St. John's Episcopal Church of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API