Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1994No. S93G1837, S94G0225PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

These consolidated cases are before the Court from the grant of certiorari to consider the Court of Appeals decisions in Hobbs v. Arthur, 209 Ga. App. 855 (1) (434 SE2d 748) (1993), and Dependable Courier Svc. v. Dinkins, 210 Ga. App. 665 (436 SE2d 719) (1993), with respect to whether diligence in service of process of a renewed complaint brought under OCGA § 9-2-61 (a) must be measured from the time of filing the renewed action.

OCGA § 9-2-61 (a) provides:

When any case, has been commenced in either a state or federal court within the applicable statute of limitations and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cox v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Hilton v. Maddox, Bishop, Hayton Frame & Trim Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Clark v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Patterson v. Douglas Women's Center, PCSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. James Giles v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Chandler v. OPENSIDED MRI OF ATLANTA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Hedquist v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Roberson v. NorthrupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API