Legal Opinion

James N. Stephens v. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary, James N. Stephens v. Terry S. Coleman, Isabel P. Dunst

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1990No. 89-8550, 89-8551PublishedCited by 310 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDISERT, Senior Circuit Judge:

The major question presented in these appeals by James N. Stephens, Deputy Regional Attorney of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), who was an unsuccessful candidate for the office of Regional Attorney, is whether the district court properly concluded that the grievance procedure set forth in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA), codified and amended in various sections of 5 U.S.C., precludes federal court review of an alleged “prohibited personnel practice,” where the Office of Special Counsel declines to petition the Merit Systems…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by310 opinions

  1. GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. American United Life Insurance v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Rosenberg v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API