Legal Opinion

Isley v. Little

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1962No. 21476PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. A lawful business may,, by reason of its location in a residential area, cause hurt, inconvenience and damage to those residing in the vicinity and become a nuisance per accidens by reason of circumstances and surroundings. Code § 72-101. And such nuisance may be abated in an action at law, if outside a municipal corporation (Code § 72-201), or if within a municipal corporation (Code § 72-401).'

2. Such nuisance may be abated in equity if the hurt or damage is irreparable or continuing. Code § 72-204. While mere apprehension of injury and damage is insufficient,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elder v. City of WinderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Looper v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Nottingham v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Mayor &C. of Athens v. Co-Op Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Powell v. GarmanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Isley v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. Gustafson v. Cotco Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Camp v. WarringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Frazier v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. Hood v. Winding-Vista Recreation, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API