Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mann v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 2016No. CV-15-595Published

1ConcurrenceCourtney Hudson Goodson, Justice

We accepted certification of this case from our court of appeals. In the certification memorandum transmitted by the court of appeals, the court asked us to consider an issue it believes to be of jurisdictional significance concerning the contents of a notice of appeal, noting an apparent conflict between the decisions of this court and the court of appeals. Rightfully so, the majority opinion resolves this conflict. I write separately to underscore why it is necessary to address the issue raised by the court of appeals.

|nMann’s notice of appeal states that he is appealing the “[ojrder filed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Tudor InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Davis v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Lindsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Jasper v. Johnny's PizzaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API