Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Freedman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2006No. 2006-0067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Howard Joel Freedman of Chagrin Falls, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0016247, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1970.

{¶ 2} On December 6, 2004, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged respondent with having allowed improper notarization of his wife’s signature on loan documents and with having thereby violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline held a hearing at which respondent testified and stipulations and exhibits were submitted. The panel made findings of misconduct, which the board…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. MelnickOhio Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. TriversOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Macejko (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BillingsleyOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. TriversOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API