Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 28, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Edward Higgins petitions for review of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board affirming the order of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that denied the modification and reinstatement petitions filed by Higgins against the City of Philadelphia (Employer). Higgins contends that the WCJ capriciously disregarded substantial competent evidence when she made findings of fact unsupported by the record and failed to issue a reasoned decision and that the Board misapprehended the facts and the law and similarly disregarded substantial competent evidence in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Amandeo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Pryor v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. ICT Group v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Green v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Repash v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API