Creighton v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in granting Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent Russell Anderson’s motion for summary judgment on the Creightons’ claim that Anderson’s warrant-less search of their home at night violated their rights under the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.
I. FACTS.
Because this case was dismissed on Anderson’s motion for summary judgment, we set out the facts in the light most favorable to the Creightons and draw all inferences from the underlying…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Jackson Warren v. City of Lincoln, Nebraska James Breen Sandra L. Myers and David M. BeggsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Sandra Der v. Sean ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Allen L. Fludd v. United States Secret Service Maurice DaughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Vitalone v. CurranDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.