Legal Opinion

Hale v. Cooper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1935No. Docket No. 52, Calendar No. 38,010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover damages for injuries received in an automobile collision claimed to have been caused by the negligence of defendants. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring the cause to this court on an appeal in the nature of a writ of error.

Several witnesses were sworn. The testimony is not conflicting as to the essential facts.

Plaintiff was riding as a guest passenger in an automobile driven by a Mr. Ladd. “It was a very bad night. The road was just a glare of ice. It was misting that night and the weather was freezing. As the mist fell it would freeze.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. TowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Webster v. SymesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berry v. J & D Auto Dismantlers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Grant v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lucy v. DowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Nielsen v. RichmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Bowman v. StrubleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API