Legal Opinion

McLendon v. Woodmen of the World

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

. 'FROM SÍTETJBY. A.ppeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWit-tcrs, J.

The defendant is a fraternal and beneficial order. Its objects and purposes are thus set out in its “Constitution and Laws”:

“Sec. 3. The • object of this order shall be to combine white male persons of sound bodily health, exemplary habits, and good moral character, between the ages of eighteen and fifty-two, into a secret, fraternal, beneficiary, and benevolent order; provide funds for their relief; comfort the sick and cheer the unfortunate by attentive ministrations in times of sorrow' and distress; educate its members in moral, social, and intellectual matters, and promote fraternal love…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Fitzmaurice v. Mutual Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. RudolphTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Kohen v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
  5. Ray v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brownwood Benev. Ass'n v. ManessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Liberty National Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Betty S. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  4. American National Insurance Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
  5. Sterling v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldUtah Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API