Legal Opinion
McLendon v. Woodmen of the World
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions
. 'FROM SÍTETJBY. A.ppeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.
1Opinion of the CourtWit-tcrs, J.
The defendant is a fraternal and beneficial order. Its objects and purposes are thus set out in its “Constitution and Laws”:
“Sec. 3. The • object of this order shall be to combine white male persons of sound bodily health, exemplary habits, and good moral character, between the ages of eighteen and fifty-two, into a secret, fraternal, beneficiary, and benevolent order; provide funds for their relief; comfort the sick and cheer the unfortunate by attentive ministrations in times of sorrow' and distress; educate its members in moral, social, and intellectual matters, and promote fraternal love…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Fitzmaurice v. Mutual Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. RudolphTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Kohen v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1886
- Ray v. Security Trust & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brownwood Benev. Ass'n v. ManessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Modern Woodmen of America v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Liberty National Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Betty S. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- American National Insurance Company v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Sterling v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the WorldUtah Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.