Legal Opinion

In re Stewart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1952No. 32832Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner contends that he was deprived of his constitutional right to due process of law by the trial court’s permitting of an amendment of the original indictment during trial' by deleting therefrom the name of the person upon whom the offense was charged to have been committed and substituting therefor the name of another, pursuant to Section 13437-29, General Code, which permits amendment of an indictment before, during or after trial, “provided no change is made in the name or identity of the crime charged.” (Italics added.)

The remedy for review of alleged errors or irregularities in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BursonOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re AmesOhio Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API