Legal Opinion

Raze v. Mueller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1999No. C2-97-865PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case arises out of an October 16,1994, motor vehicle accident involving appellant Yvonne Mueller and respondent Margaret Raze. The case was tried to a jury, which found Mueller 100% causally negligent for the accident and awarded Raze damages for past and future medical expenses and lost wages, but not for future loss of earning capacity or for past or future pain and suffering. Raze moved for a new trial or for additur, claiming the jury erred by awarding her damages for past and future medical expenses while failing to award damages for pain and suffering. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Reese v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Seydel v. ReuberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Brannan v. ShertzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Longbehn v. SchoenrockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API