Legal Opinion

Robert R. Cuppett v. Jack R. Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Reformatory

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 8, 1993No. 89-1896Published

1Opinion of the Court

8 F.3d 1132

Robert R. CUPPETT, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Jack R. DUCKWORTH,* Superintendent, Indiana

State Reformatory, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-1896.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued June 16, 1992.

Reargued En Banc June 2, 1993.

Decided Oct. 8, 1993.

Barry Levenstam (argued), Jerold S. Solovy, Allen C. Schlinsog, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, for petitioner-appellant.

Michael A. Schoening, Deputy Atty. Gen., Charles R. Oehrle, Wayne E. Uhl, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Federal Litigation, Indianapolis, IN, for respondent-appellee.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and CUMMINGS, BAUER,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Easterbrook; Concurrence · Ripple; Dissent.

2Cases cited146 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API