Legal Opinion

Treishel v. McGill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Iroquois County ; the Hon. Alfred Sample, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

A motion was filed in this case by the appellee to strike the bill of exceptions filed herein from the record, and the causes assigned therefor are, first, that no bill of exceptions or copy thereof was served upon or left with appellee br his attorneys five days before the time of the presentation thereof to the trial judge for his signature, under «Rule 7 ” of the rules of practice, then in force in said trial court; and second, there was no waiver of such notice and copy, or of leaving the original bill with appellee or his attorneys, as required by said “ Rule 7.”

The facts, so far as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hake v. StrubelIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. HawesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  3. People ex rel. City of Gilman v. BladesIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Magnuson v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Martin v. De LogeMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hopper v. MatherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API