Bond v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Osage county of the crime of sodomy, and his punishment fixed by the court at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of five years.
The evidence of the state is too revolting, to set out in this opinion.
Defendant contends, first, that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to' law.
The particular complaint of defendant is that the testimony of the complaining witness is incredible and unbelievable and is not sufficiently corroborated.
The story told by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- Updike v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Teel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Gallagher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Humberd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
- Coats v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.