Legal Opinion
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Kappos
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 6, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2010-1110PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., brings suit against the defendant, Michelle Lee, the Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), alleging that the defendant improperly calculated the adjustment period for its patent term. 1 Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, ECP No. 18, and the defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19. For the reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs motion…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daiichi Sankyo Company v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Oceana, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Peterson v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020