The People v. Valadez
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLIER, J.
Appellants Frank Uribe and Daniel Valadez challenge their convictions for conspiring to commit the crimes of shooting from a vehicle and assault with a semiautomatic firearm and for possession of a firearm by a felon, along with gang and other enhancements. They raise a host of alleged errors, both together and individually. 1 In the published portion of this opinion, we reject their evidentiary and confrontation clause challenges to the prosecution’s gang expert witness. In the unpublished portion, we find no prejudicial error on any other ground. We affirm. We modify the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. MerazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Blessett, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Iraheta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.