Howard v. Oppenheimer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal- from tbe Superior Court of Baltimore city. This is- an appeal from an order'of the’Superior Court of Baltimore' city, (Martin, J.,-) of the? 28th of November, 1864, sustaining a motion to quash an attachment on original process issued on the'16th of June, 1864, from said Court, under the Act ófl864,
1Opinion of the CourtWeisel, J.
This case presents questions of practice under the Act of 1864, ch. 306, being a sub-title to the codified attachment law of the State, under the head of “ Attachments on Original Process.” The first section of this Act specifies four cases in which an attaching plaintiff shall have the right to proceed by attachment. Two of these contain branches in the disjunctive. These two are incorporated in the affidavit in this case, in the language used in the said section. And it is alleged on the motion to quash, that this is fatal to the proceeding inasmuch that the charges in the affidavit are all *362…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lambden v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
- Barr v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
- Stone v. MagruderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1839
- Ranahan v. O'NealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1834
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dumay v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Gittings v. State ex rel. OckermeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Union Tr. Co. of N.J. v. KnabeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- Duttera v. BabylonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.