Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentSerna, Chief Justice
{23} I respectfully dissent from Section 11(B) of the majority opinion. The majority concludes that this case is not controlled by the venue provision relating to claims involving an interest in lands, Section 38 — 3—1(D)(1), because, under the majority’s view, Plaintiffs seek only monetary damages. I am unable to agree with the majority’s conclusion that “the sole object of this suit was damages,” and I believe that the majority’s narrow construction of Plaintiffs’ complaint in order to reach this conclusion represents a significant departure from established rules of pleading in New Mexico.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Casey v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Livingston v. JeffersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1811
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.