Mateas v. Harvey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant brought action against appellee for damages for personal injuries incurred when he fell from a mule belonging to appellee, herein called the Corporation. The complaint was originally filed in the Superior Court of California, but the case was removed to federal court because of diversity of citizenship. Trial was had without the aid of a jury under a stipulation to that effect. At the close of plaintiff’s case the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, and plaintiff appeals.
There is competent evidence to the following effect:
For many years,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Dam v. Lake Aliso Riding SchoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Conn v. HunsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Kersten v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Parker v. Loving & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert L. Hargrave v. E. G. Wellman, Doing Business as Wellman EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Joseph v. TibsheranyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Koser v. HornbackIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Winegar v. Slim Olson, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Fred Harvey Corp. v. MateasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.