Kirkendall v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHALEY, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff brings this action individually and as administratrix of the estate of James F. Kirkendall. The action is based on an implied contract for the recovery of money appropriated by the defendant under legal forms and applied to the unpaid taxes of another person.
For many years there was solicited through the mails, and otherwise, subscriptions for the prosecution of a claim to collect a large estate supposed to be in England and known as the “Sir Francis Drake Estate.” Promise was held out to those who contributed to receive a return in a thousand fold for each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dooley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- United States v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Alabama Hospital Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.