Legal Opinion
Molinaro v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 1979No. 76 CIV. 2582(MP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment in its favor pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons shown hereafter the motion will be granted.
This is one of more than 20 actions instituted by these plaintiffs against various manufacturers, distributors, and retailers of radio receiving equipment, alleging infringement of U. S. Patent 2,906,875, issued on September 29, 1959 to plaintiff Edward T. Molinaro, and having expired on September 29, 1976. Co-plaintiff Anthony P. Catanzaro is an assignee of a one-half interest in the patent. Plaintiffs’ claim in the case at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Myers v. GockleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Catanzaro v. Masco Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edward T. Molinaro and Anthony P. Catanzaro v. Fannon/courier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984