Bowman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
In these consolidated civilian pay actions, plaintiffs, civilian employees of the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District (Corps), seek to recover overtime compensation under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5544(a) (1976).1
Plaintiffs’ position is that they are entitled to recover overtime compensation because they were required to remain on board the vessel on which they worked, during off-duty hours. Defendant, on the other hand, contends that plaintiffs were not required, within any sense of the applicable law, to remain on board the vessel during…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mercier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- NALTNER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024