Legal Opinion

Bowman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 24, 1985No. Nos. 393-82C, 394-82C and 395-82CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In these consolidated civilian pay actions, plaintiffs, civilian employees of the Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District (Corps), seek to recover overtime compensation under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. § 5544(a) (1976).1

Plaintiffs’ position is that they are entitled to recover overtime compensation because they were required to remain on board the vessel on which they worked, during off-duty hours. Defendant, on the other hand, contends that plaintiffs were not required, within any sense of the applicable law, to remain on board the vessel during…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. The United States v. Patrick J. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Beebe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Albright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mercier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. NALTNER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API