Legal Opinion
Tobey v. National Labor Relations Board
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-413PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
Before the Court are two dispositive motions, fully briefed, and submitted on the papers: defendants’ motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons stated herein, plaintiffs’ motion shall be denied and defendants’ motion shall be granted. 2
Background
Plaintiff is employed by the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB”) as a field examiner. In 1979, the NLRB created a computer system capable of tracking and monitoring the approximately 40,000 unfair labor practice and representation cases handled each year by the NLRB. This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Al Louis Ripskis v. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Houston v. United States Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Carr L. Donald v. Alejandro OrfilaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas J. Tobey v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994