Al Louis Ripskis v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was briefed and argued by counsel. The court has fully considered the issues presented; they occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 13(c).
For the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the judgment of the District Court from which this appeal is taken is affirmed. It is
FURTHER ORDERED by this court, sua sponte, that the Clerk shall withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States Department of State v. Washington Post Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rural Housing Alliance v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Julius G. Getman v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by64 opinions
- National Association of Retired Federal Employees v. Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Bigwood v. United States Agency for International DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Dawson v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Prison Legal News v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Consumers' Checkbook, Center for the Study of Services v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.