Legal Opinion
In Re Neff
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 1969No. 3427PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRutherford, J.
During the trial of the State of Ohio against George DiGiantonio, on April 15,1968, on a charge of breaking and entering and grand larceny, the trial judge received information from the prosecuting attorney that one George Jackson, a witness in the case, had been offered money and threatened by a person in the hallway outside the courtroom.
At that point the trial judge excused the jury and proceeded as follows, as shown by the bill of exceptions:
“The Court: Sir, will you come up here and take the stand here.
“Roger Neff, called to testify, after being first duly sworn by the court, testified…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Town of Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Knox v. Municipal Court of City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- In Re CarrollOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re ChambersOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cleveland v. BrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.