In Re Hopeman Bros. Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus, papers filed in this proceeding, and argument of counsel, the Court is of opinion that the writ of mandamus shall not issue.
Petitioner is not entitled to the issuance of a writ of mandamus because petitioner failed to establish a clear and specific legal right to be enforced, or a duty which ought to be and can be performed. As this Court has stated:
“The writ of mandamus, known in England as a high prerogative writ, is justly regarded in this country as one of the highest writs known to our system of jurisprudence; and it only issues…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Richmond-Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Goldman v. LandsidleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Cain v. Armstrong World IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1992
- Town of Front Royal v. Front Royal & Warren County Industrial Park Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002