Legal Opinion

Burgess v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-0879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHAN, Judge.

Mary Kathlyn Burgess appeals the denial of her application for postconvietion relief. Burgess alleges the trial court erred when it determined she received effective assistance of counsel. Burgess contends her counsel: (l)allowed her to plead guilty to a charge for which no factual basis existed; (2) failed to file a motion in arrest of judgment; and (3)failed to adequately inform her about the status of the law. We reverse.

Burgess was charged with second-degree theft based upon allegations she had received down payments for goods and services but failed to deliver them. Public…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. State v. WissingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  3. United States v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. Dan Dorris, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  5. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API