Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Riddell v. District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1906No. 2,264PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Certiorari in the name of the state, on the relation of J. A. Riddell, against the district court of the second judicial district of the state of Montana and Honorable John B. MeClernan, a judge thereof, to review an order taxing costs.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

Certiorari. On appeal to this court by the defendants in a cause entitled Riddell v. Ramsey et al., 31 Mont. 386, 78 Pac. 597, a judgment in favor of plaintiff and an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial were reversed. When the remittitur went down to the district court, the defendants filed with the clerk their verified memorandum of costs and disburse ments on the appeal and caused execution to be issued therefor as upon a judgment under the statute. (Code of Civil Proc., sec. 1869.) Thereupon the plaintiff filed his motion, supported- by affidavit, to the' effect that a copy of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Dow v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Sellick v. De CarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Riddell v. HarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. State ex rel. Hurley v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Lemley v. AllenMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Vaughn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brunnabend v. TibblesMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Houghton v. BartonUtah Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API